Back
Case Studies
Case study of a
building firm refused a renewal Subcontractor Exemption
Certificate in the Construction Industry.
The regulations concerning
Contractors and Subcontractors operating in the industry
have progressively been tightened and are now very stringent.
To be issued with a
certificate enabling payment for work done to be made
gross (i.e. without tax being deducted) is reliant upon,
amongst other things, having a faultless compliance record,
i.e. to have paid all taxes and met all obligations on
time.
As with all businesses,
the Inland Revenue is one creditor amongst many and this
involves a constant juggling act to keep all creditors,
suppliers and the taxman happy.
The managing director
was completely up front and honest about these things
and had developed a very good working relationship with
his local tax office.
As he had spare money,
he would call into the tax office and they would allocate
it against the most pressing debt. This arrangement had
worked well for years and he had not even incurred any
form of penalty charge over all this time. At the time
his exemption certificate was coming up for renewal, the
Inland Revenue underwent another of its regular reorganisation,
and he found himself being responsible to a new tax office
some distance away.
The new tax office, on receiving his renewal application
for an exemption certificate, immediately refused it on
the basis of the past compliance record, which showed
arrears of tax at one time or other, over the period.
The builder’s
situation was made more difficult by the existence of
a similar case which ended up at the High Court, where
the judge had upheld the Inspector of Taxes decision not
to renew the certificate in view of the compliance record.
Not surprisingly, the Revenue was using this case as a
reason for doing exactly the same thing.
The tragedy was that
the builder had just secured a contract with a very large
multinational company, which would transform his company
and lead to the employment of many more staff. The company
was in any event, well known locally for its charitable
work.
Despite all pleadings,
the Revenue set its face against the builder and continued
to refuse the renewal of the certificate. Eventually,
the matter was listed for hearing before the General Commissioners
– an independent tribunal made up of local business
people.
At this stage, Malcolm
Preece was called in to help. At first sight, the builder’s
plight seemed hopeless. Indeed, the payment record of
his company was worse than that in the decided court case
which the Revenue were going to use against him.
Malcolm luckily had
inspiration the night before the tribunal hearing and
although there was still a mountain to climb, he felt
at least that he had an argument to put before the Commissioners.
In the court case,
the builder had been warned of his poor compliance record
by the Revenue, and the problem had persisted.
In our case, the builder
had never sought to shirk his responsibilities but had
remained in contact with his local office throughout.
He had NEVER been warned of his conduct and had never
had a penalty or any sanction awarded against him.
There was absolutely
no reason to believe that he would not live up to his
responsibilities – he had never shirked them. Moreover,
the Revenue’s heavy-handed approach would put the
firm out of business, losing a great many existing jobs
whilst denying the prospect of the firm’s expansion.
The local charitable
work would also be lost to the community. The venom with
which the General Commission cross-examined the Revenue
team made it clear from an early stage that they were
going to find for the builder appellant and this they
duly did.
Even then, Malcolm
had to pressurise the Revenue into issuing the renewal
certificate.
Happily the builder
has his certificate, his lucrative contracts and the business
is expanding.
Malcolm says that he
takes more pleasure out of this victory than any other
recent one. He has kept an honest, hard working man in
business and enabled him to prosper against all the odds.
Should you require further information, please contact
us on 01384 217222.
Top
|